The Relationship Between Science and Reality Essay -- Science Scientif

The Relationship Between Science and Reality The relationship between science and reality has more to do with coexistence rather than one idea being superior to the other. I shall first define what each means and then give examplester's of how I arrive a t this coexistence theory. According to Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, 1 ed., science is defined as follows: 1. a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws: the mathematical sciences. 2. systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation. 3. systematized knowledge in general. The same dictionary defines reality as: 1. the state or quality of being real. 2. Philos. a. something that exists independently of ideas concerning it. b. something that exists independently of all other things and from which all other things derive. I have a 5-year-old nephew who is alive because he received a heart transplant a few weeks after his birth. His parents very public request for organ donors received a lot of attention at the time, including a local radio talk show that discussed the organ donor program in general and whether this particular baby should be given a new heart. The replies were astonishing to me in both their intensity and their divisiveness. That some people could publicly say, "let the baby die†¦it’s God’s way," left me with my jaw hanging open. Some callers talked about how it was unnatural for science to be used in such a manner while others praised the fact that we now had the technology to allow a child, who might otherwise die, live. Today, that medical miracle of science wil... ...dual, not social preferences†¦[which] is why in almost every country in the world, the automobile has triumphed†¦"(p308). He concludes that cars make California more enjoyable. Our group all agreed. As I stated earlier, The Relationship between Science and Reality, is about co-existence. We need both science and reality to not only coexist, but also to continue to improve our lives. Works Cited Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary, Second Edition. 1999 ed. Bishop, Michael J, "Enemies of Promise." Lunsford, Andrea and John Ruszkiewicz, The Presence of Others: Voices and Images That Call for Response 3rd ed. New York: St. Martin’s 2000. 237-242. Wilson, James Q, "Cars and Their Enemies." Lunsford, Andrea and John Ruszkiewicz, The Presence of Others: Voices and Images That Call for Response 3rd ed. New York: St. Martin’s 2000. 303-313.

Federalist Argument for Ratification of the Constitution

Federalist Argument for Ratification of the Constitution November 18, 2010 Americans, prior to and shortly after the Revolutionary War, were strongly united under one opinion. The common belief that America ought to be an independent state, with its own system of government can be found in the literature of each and every colony. However, after the failure of the first governing document, the Articles of Confederation, delegates met in Philadelphia in order to draft a better functioning constitution. In this debate, the opinion of America soon became divided.On one side were the supporters of the proposed constitution (Federalists) and on the other the opponents (Anti-Federalists). The Federalists urged their fellow delegates and the nation for the establishment of a consolidated federal government that gets its power from an energetic constitution. The reason behind this position was none other than the failure of the Articles of Confederation. Although the two sides disagreed over the role and authority of the federal government, they did hold one thing in common: the Articles of Confederation were inadequate and threatened the preservation of the union.The Anti-Federalists believed that the flaws of the Articles of Confederation could be fixed by amendments while the Federalists combated that claim by suggesting that the â€Å"material defects† that exist in the articles cannot be repaired and thus a new, more energetic, constitution must be drafted. Additionally, the Anti-Federalists sought to support the Articles of Confederation because they believed that there are more problems introduced by the newly proposed constitution.They argued that the document would establish an untested form of government and they maintained that the Framers of the Constitution were an elitist group that had met in secrecy in order to empower â€Å"moneyed few. † The Federalists refuted the claims of their opponents in a series of essays that underlined the follow ing central ideas: the benefit of the union to the colonies; defense of republicanism in the newly proposed constitution; and the necessity of an energetic, proficient federal government. As previously stated, both sides agreed that the Articles of Confederation ere incapable of preserving the union. However, the Anti-Federalists believed in confederated government made up of small republics (as it existed prior to the ratification of the Constitution). â€Å"If the people are to give their assent to the laws, by persons chosen and appointed by them, the manner of the choice and the number chosen, must be such, as to possess, be disposed, and consequently qualified to declare the sentiments of the people; for if they do not know, or are not disposed to speak the sentiments of the people, the people do not govern, but the sovereignty is in a few.Now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the mi nds of the people, without having it so numerous and unwieldly, as to be subject in great measure to the inconveniency of a democratic government† (Hammond, Hardwick, & Lubert, 2007, p. 538). According to their argument, small republics preserve liberty best because citizens of small republics know the elected officials on a personal level and it is this intimate connection that assures obedience of the law.A confederation of states allows for the existence of states that reflect their constituents. In a large republic there will be many opinions and laws will be diluted by the number of opinions. This can create conflict and threaten the union. In Federalist 10, James Madison disproves this claim by stating the Federalist belief that large republics produce better candidates and a majority that is more inclusive to existing minorities. In the next place, as each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens in the large than in the small republic, it will be more difficult for unworthy candidates to practice with success the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried; and the suffrages of the people being more free, will be more likely to centre in men who possess the most attractive merit and the most diffusive and established characters† (Hammond, Hardwick, & Lubert, 2007, p. 465).Madison reasons that in a large state the number of voters and candidates is greater therefore the probability of electing a qualified representative is also greater. In a small republic candidates running in election can fool voters easier than in a large republic. Thus, Madison, in contrast to the Anti-Federalists, saw the large size of the United States as a help rather than a hindrance to the cause of liberty. Due to these qualities of large republics the salvation of the union would be facilitated.Federal inability to enforce laws on the states leads the Federalists to desire an energetic constitution that gave the government mor e authority and the apparatuses necessary to enforce its sovereignty. Under the Articles of Confederation, states were left to enforce federal law. Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist 15, argues that this practice â€Å"†¦in theory their resolutions concerning those objects are laws, constitutionally binding on the members of the Union, yet in practice they are mere recommendations which the States observe or disregard at their option† (Hammond, Hardwick, & Lubert, 2007, p. 472).Furthermore, he expands on federal powers and tools needed for enforcement in Federalist 23. In defense of the â€Å"necessary and proper† clause of the Constitution, Hamilton states that â€Å"†¦because it is impossible to foresee or define the extent and variety of national exigencies, or the correspondent extent and variety of the means which may be necessary to satisfy them† (Hammond, Hardwick, & Lubert, 2007, p. 478). The new constitution would enable to federal gove rnment to implement its authority over members of the union. In a federalist view this is a necessary improvement for the security of the union.If the national government is given responsibilities then it ought to also have the tools needed to carry out those responsibilities. The lack of clear and complete separation between the executive, legislative and judicial bodies was viewed by the Anti-Federalist as a reintroduction of a monarchial and tyrannical regime. James Madison, on the other hand, reasoned that the best government of the time, as it existed in Britain, and all of the colonies already practiced the same overlapping of powers that was found in the proposed constitution.In Federalist 48, Madison argues that it is this very overlapping of authority that preserves the separation of powers; â€Å"The conclusion which I am warranted in drawing from these observations is, that a mere demarcation on parchment of the constitutional limits of the several departments, is not a sufficient guard against those encroachments which lead to a tyrannical concentration of all the powers of government in the same hands† (Hammond, Hardwick, & Lubert, 2007, p. 494).He believed that his opponents had read Montesquieu but had not understood his notion of separation of powers clearly. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government simultaneously holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu â€Å"did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other† (Hammond, Hardwick, & Lubert, 2007, p. 490). Thus, the above claim enabled the Federalists to sufficiently settle the argument on this issue.As brilliant as the Federalist Papers were they were not the sole reason that the proposed constitution was ratified. Nevertheless, they aided the constitution's cause by giving the constitution's adherents ideas with which to counter their oppositi on. The Anti-Federalist outcry was not without its effects. With the ratification of the Constitution state legislatures voted for the addition of the first ten amendments. The Bill of Rights, as it came to be known, became an essential part of the document and its legacy of liberty.The ratification of the Constitution not only changed the political culture but also the social. Soon after its approval, American experienced a social shift as well. Citizens no longer saw themselves as only Virginians or New Yorkers; instead they became something larger than that, they became American first and the rest as they say is history.Works Cited Hammond, S. , Hardwick, K. , & Lubert, H. (2007). Classics of american political & constitutional thought. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

What Is Distillation Principles and Uses

Distillation is an important separation process in chemistry, industry, and food science. Here is the definition of distillation and a look at the types of distillation and its uses. Key Takeaways: Distillation Distillation is the process of separating components of a mixture based on different boiling points.Examples of uses of distillation include purification of alcohol, desalination, crude oil refining, and making liquefied gases from air.Humans have been using distillation since at least 3000 BC in the Indus valley. Distillation Definition Distillation is a widely used method for separating mixtures based on differences in the conditions required to change the phase of components of the mixture. To separate a mixture of liquids, the liquid can be heated to force components, which have different boiling points, into the gas phase. The gas is then condensed back into liquid form and collected. Repeating the process on the collected liquid to improve the purity of the product is called double distillation. Although the term is most commonly applied to liquids, the reverse process can be used to separate gases by liquefying components using changes in temperature and/or pressure. A plant that performs distillation is called a distillery. The apparatus used to perform distillation is called a still. History The earliest known evidence of distillation comes from a terracotta distillation apparatus dating to 3000 BC in the Indus valley of Pakistan. Distillation was known to be used by the Babylonians of Mesopotamia. Initially, distillation is believed to have been used to make perfumes. Distillation of beverages occurred much later. The Arab chemist Al-Kindi distilled alcohol in 9th century Irag. Distillation of alcoholic beverages appears common in Italy and China starting in the 12th century. Uses of Distillation Distillation is used for many commercial processes, such as the  production of gasoline, distilled water, xylene, alcohol, paraffin, kerosene, and many other liquids. Gas may be liquefied and separate. For example: nitrogen, oxygen, and argon are distilled from air. Types of Distillation Types of distillation include simple distillation, fractional distillation (different volatile fractions are collected as they are produced), and destructive distillation (usually, a material is heated so that it decomposes into compounds for collection). Simple Distillation Simple distillation may be used when the boiling points of two liquids are significantly different from each other or to separate liquids from solids or nonvolatile components. In simple distillation, a mixture is heated to change the most volatile component from a liquid into vapor. The vapor rises and passes into a condenser. Usually, the condenser is cooled (e.g., by running cold water around it) to promote condensation of the vapor, which is collected. Steam Distillation Steam distillation is used to separate heat-sensitive components. Steam is added to the mixture, causing some of it to vaporize. This vapor is cooled and condensed into two liquid fractions. Sometimes the fractions are collected separately, or they may have different density values, so they separate on their own. An example is steam distillation of flowers to yield essential oil and a water-based distillate. Fractional Distillation Fractional distillation is used when the boiling points of the components of a mixture are close to each other, as determined using Raoults law. A fractionating column is used to separate the components used a series of distillations called rectification. In fractional distillation, a mixture is heated so vapor rises and enters the fractionating column. As the vapor cools, it condenses on the packing material of the column. The heat of rising vapor causes this liquid to vaporize again, moving it along the column and eventually yielding a higher purity sample of the more volatile component of the mixture. Vacuum Distillation Vacuum distillation is used to separate components that have high boiling points. Lowering the pressure of the apparatus also lowers boiling points. Otherwise, the process is similar to other forms of distillation. Vacuum distillation is particularly useful when the normal boiling point exceeds the decomposition temperature of a compound. Sources Allchin, F. R. (1979). India: The Ancient Home of Distillation?. Man. 14 (1): 55–63. doi:10.2307/2801640Forbes, R. J. (1970). A Short History of the Art of Distillation from the Beginnings up to the Death of Cellier Blumenthal. BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-00617-1.Harwood, Laurence M.; Moody, Christopher J. (1989). Experimental organic chemistry: Principles and Practice (Illustrated ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. ISBN 978-0-632-02017-1.

Persuasive Essay Abortion - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 1 Words: 338 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2017/09/17 Category Health Essay Type Argumentative essay Tags: Abortion Essay Did you like this example? Persuasive Essay An abortion is defined as the termination of a pregnancy by the removal of a fetus/embryo from the uterus resulting in death. I do not see how that cannot be considered as murder. When a life is purposefully taken by another person, it is murder. There are many other options for mothers that are not ready to be mothers. Having your baby aborted is not the answer; it is just the easiest way to deal with your problem. If a mother is considering having an abortion, she can put her baby up for adoption instead. With the precautions taken for placing children, the child will be put in a home where it can grow up in a healthy and loving environment. The child will be able to live a good life and become a successful member of society. If it had been aborted the child would never have had a chance to live and love. Another option is to keep the baby. Of course sacrifices will have to be made, but the life of a child is more important than money or time. Raising a child is difficult, but there is always family and friends that are ready to help and lend a hand whenever needed. There are ways to receive an education from home or at night if that is the only way to study but also take care of a child. Abortions are selfish acts on the part of mothers. They do not want to deal with the hardships that they are faced with after becoming pregnant. I am sure they are scared, but an abortion is not the answer. Our society is always looking for the easiest, quickest way to solve a problem. This mindset is what makes abortion look so appetizing to young girls who do not know what to do with the surprise they have just received. Unfortunately this easy answer results in the death of an unborn child, defenseless against all outside forces, unable to defend its own life. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Persuasive Essay: Abortion" essay for you Create order

Essay on Response to Bitzers Rhetorical Situation

In The Rhetorical Situation, Lloyd F. Bitzer argues that what makes a situation rhetorical is similar to that which constitutes a moral action as he writes that, â€Å"an act is moral because it is an act performed in a situation of a certain kind; similarly, a work is rhetorical because it is a response to a situation of a certain kind†.(3) By defining the rhetorical situation in this way, Bitzer further contends that rhetoric is a means to altering reality. (4) It is through the use of discourse that one is capable of changing reality through thought and action. (4) Bitzer then elaborates upon the nature of a rhetorical situation by explaining that rhetorical discourse enters a situation when: providing a response to its state of affairs;†¦show more content†¦Although Bitzer continues in the third section of his essay, by outlining the general characteristics or features of a rhetorical situation, it is his discussion of sophistical rhetoric that is most interest ing. (11) He notes that a sophistic situation is one where a contrived exigence is, â€Å"asserted to be real... alleged constituents are due to error or ignorance,... and [it derives] from fantasy in which exigence, audience, and constraints may all be imaginary objects of a mind at play†. (11) He concludes that, â€Å"rhetoric is distinguished from the mere craft of persuasion which, although it is a legitimate object of scientific investigation, lacks philosophical warrant as a practical discipline†. (14) While Bitzer’s insights into how one may think about the way in which rhetorical discourse acts upon and therefore alters the reality of a situation, it is difficult to see his point in stating that the â€Å"mere craft of persuasion† lacks philosophical warrant as a practical discipline. The clearest reason it seems, is implied from the examples that Bitzer uses, none of which are theological or religious in nature, but rather the examples he pro vides are usually political. Although one is left to speculate as to what categories Bitzer would include in sophistical rhetoric (other than a play or novel), might theological and religious discourse be subsumed underShow MoreRelatedThe Young Woman s Christian Association1109 Words   |  5 Pagesmovement towards fighting domestic violence and homelessness will be based off Bitzer’s model, TARES test, narratives and argument, visual rhetoric, symmetrical and asymmetrical communication forms, as well as, ways to improve the organizations rhetoric. Bitzer’s Model Bitzer’s model is helpful in analyzing organizations because it helps determines who the rhetor is, the exigence, response type, fitting response, rhetorical audience, and constraints. The rhetors of the organization are the foundersRead MoreBitzers Rhetorical Model1168 Words   |  5 PagesHayes March 31, 2011 Bitzer’s â€Å"The Rhetorical Situation† â€Å"Penguin responses to climate change in the Southern Ocean† by Jaume Forcada and Philip N. Trathan (2009) was a study conducted to analyze and predict the migrating patterns of different species of penguins due to changes in climate. (p. 1618) Also, Forcada and Trathan investigate whether or not certain species of penguins possess phenotypic plasticity (the ability of an organism to change its phenotype in response to changes in the environment)Read MoreRhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Jr s Letter From Birmingham Jail1499 Words   |  6 Pagesand rhetorical situation. When reading critically we become acquainted with these concepts therefore become better writers ourselves. While learning about rhetorical writing and composition we have analyzed Billy Collins â€Å" Commencement Address at Choate- Rosemary Hall† , Martin Luther King Jr’s â€Å"letter from Birmingham Jail† and Lloyd Bitzer’s essay on â€Å"Rhetorical Situationâ₠¬ . In this paper I will analyze and make connections between the concepts of audience, genre and rhetorical situation in connectionRead MoreJohn Franklin D. Roosevelt s The Pearl Harbor Address Essay1542 Words   |  7 Pagestraumatic or undesirable situations produce memorable speeches which guide people into action or change attitudes. Emerson’s saying suggests the best speaking and writing rises from troubling events. The quote relates to the notion in Bitzer’s essay that true rhetorical discourse occurs when a speaker addresses an audience in response to a situation in order to induce change. An example of this in a historical context is President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Pearl Harbor Address. A response to a terrible eventRead MoreRhetorical Analysis : Rhetorical Rhetoric Essay1465 Words   |  6 Pagesof good writing requires close attention to a rhetorical situation, genre, and an audience. Writing occurs within a rhetorical situation and is made up of a speaker, a subject, an audience, and the context (genre). Each of these criteria builds on one another to make a piece of writing. The speaker or writer can choose what form of text or genre he/she wants the audience to get out of the context. Genre and the audience make up a rhetorical situation. The genre and audience both rely on each otherRead MoreMlk Jr.’S â€Å"Letter from a Birmingham Jail†1325 Words   |  6 Pagesjob in communicating the urgency of the situation without sounding personally impatient in his letter. His ability to create a sound argument without emotion makes his †Å"Letter from a Birmingham Jail† all the more provocative. However, that being said, King also does a great job of establishing pathos. Introducing his letter, King states that he is responding to claims made about his actions, showing that his letter has a direct action causing this response. He continually refers to himself as aRead MoreAnalysis Of Beyonce Knowles s The Black Essay1208 Words   |  5 PagesBlack Lives Matter is a national organization striving to rebuild the Black liberation movement; that has become vague in past years. In 2012 after Trayvon Martin’s murderer, George Zimmerman, was dismissed for his crime. This movement emerged in response to the institutionalized racism within our society. Whether it s black on black crime, police brutality or any form of ferocity actions its moral spurious. The past few months there has been a growth in police brutality, resulting in the deathsRead MoreModels of Communication7544 Words   |  31 Pagesitself b.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Pathos, inheres in the audience c.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Ethos, inheres in the speaker 3.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Bitzer’s Rhetorical Situation. Lloyd Bitzer developed described the â€Å"Rhetorical Situation,† which, while not a model, identifies some of the classical components of a communication situation (â€Å"The Rhetorical Situation,† Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1 (Winter, 1968):1-15.). Bitzer defines the â€Å"rhetorical situation† as â€Å"a complex of persons, events, objects, and relations presenting an actual or potential exigence

Elements Of A Shakespearian Tragedy Essay Research free essay sample

Elementss Of A Shakespearean Tragedy Essay, Research Paper Shakespeare wrote many calamities, which included The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. We will write a custom essay sample on Elements Of A Shakespearian Tragedy Essay Research or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page He chose to take an of import event in Roman history, the decease of Julius Caesar to compose a drama for the Globe Theater in 1599. The people who lived during the Renaissance were really interested in the drama and the narrative of Julius Caesar? s decease. Peoples? s positions of the drama dating from 1599 to the present may be really different and continually altering. Though the elements of Shakespeare? s calamity Julius Caesar and other Shakespearean calamities are all the same. A Shakespearean calamity is comprised of several elements ; two include a tragic hero and supernatural elements. In a calamity, the tragic hero is of high societal place. The tragic hero has a destructive defect which in bend brings about his ruin. There is much statement over who the tragic hero is in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Some bookmans say that the tragic hero is Julius Caesar, while others say it is Marcus Brutus. A instance can be made for both of the characters. Both Brutus and Caesar are of high societal and political position. Caesar was the dictator for life of Rome and Brutus was an honest Senator. Julius Caesar had two tragic defects. Caesar was said by Brutus to be ambitious, which led straight to his ruin # 8211 ; ? But as he was ambitious, I slew him. ? ( Act 3. Scene 2. Line 28 ) Caesar was besides chesty, he believed that he was excessively great to be harmed, Caesar said? Cowards die many times before their deceases ; the valiant neer taste decease but one time. ? ( Act 2. Scene 2. Line 34-35 ) Brutus excessively, had a tragic defect. Brutus was an dreamer, non a realist. Brutus was an optimist, he ever wanted the best for Rome. Although sometimes, Brutus couldn? t see things for what they truly are. This defect Pr evented him from doing good determinations. The supernatural elements present in the drama all foreshadow events to come. Three different characters show supernatural anticipations. The Soothsayer has an penetration of problem for Julius Caesar and he warns him # 8211 ; ? Beware the Ides of March. ? ( Act 1. Scene 2. Line 21 ) On March 15, the day of the month that Caesar was warned of, his married woman, Calphurnia had bad dreams. Calphurnia cried out in her slumber? Help Ho, they murder Caesar! ? ( Act 2. Scene 2. Line 3. ) Calphurnia knew that her dreams were a mark of what was to come. After Caesar? s decease, another occult event occurred. Marc Antony and Octavius were at war with Brutus and Cassius. Brutus was in his collapsible shelter where his ground forces was camped when the shade of Caesar appeared. During their brush Brutus asked the shade of Caesar? Why com? st 1000? ? ( Act 4.Scene 3.Line 326 ) The shade of Caesar answered, ? To state thee 1000 shalt see me at Philippi. ? ( Act 4. Scene 3. Line 327 ) During the conflicts there is a error, Pindarus, Cassius? slave, mistakes a state of affairs. Pindarus thinks that Titinius has been captured. Cassius, distraught over the information, ordered his slave to kill him in return for his freedom. Titinius found Cassius dead and killed himself. When Brutus finds both Titinius and Cassius dead he senses the shade of Caesar nowadays and says? O Julius Caesar, 1000 art mighty yet ; Thy spirit walks abroad and turns our blades in our ain proper entrails. ? ( Act 5.Scene 3.Lines 105-107 ) Of all the elements in this Shakespearean calamity, tragic heroes and supernatural elements were the most prevailing. Internal and external struggles were besides major elements in this calamity. Other readers may see the factors of this calamity in different ways, but all the elements of a calamity are present in this drama.

Freedom and Lack of Freedom free essay sample

F-redeem and lack of Freedom existed side by side in English colonies. Using examples from Pennsylvania and elsewhere demonstrate how greater freedom for some colonists meant less freedom for others. 300 to 600 words Freedom and lack of freedom co-existed in seventeenth century America because of English rule domination over Dutch rule in the colony of New York and the lack of English rule in the Pennsylvania colony.Once English rule spread to New York, it expanded the freedom of mom New Yorkers and greatly reduced the freedom of others. Pennsylvania Was the last colony to be established. William Penn wanted the colony to be free from religious prosecutions suffered in Europe. He considered the colony a Holy Experiment, which he hoped that the Quaker principles would bring equality. The developing colony of New York and Pennsylvania demonstrate how freedom and lack of freedom existed side-by-side. Freedom and lack of freedom expanded together during the seventeenth-century. We will write a custom essay sample on Freedom and Lack of Freedom or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page When the English came to New York, they wanted the Dutch to surrender. The Dutch surrendered and the English promised to allow and respect their religious beliefs and property hold nags of ethnic communities within the New York colony. Soon after allowing this freedom, the English began to revoke other privileges. The English took away the Dutch tradition of a woman marrying and conducting business and other affairs under their maiden name such as inheriting land or purchasing property during their marriage. Although theEnglish stated they would respect the property holdings of ethnic communities, the English introduced a restrictive attitude toward blacks. Blacks originally worked in various trades, but the reversal of the Dutch practice took away many skilled jobs from blacks. William Penn established the Pennsylvania colony with hopes of religious freedom. He did not consider the consequences. Before Pennsylvania was established, settlers who could afford to pay for their own passage were able to acquire land. Laborers were needed to cultivate the land.Indentured servants were the working class whites who could not afford passage. They volunteered their freedom for a certain amount of years and were treated like slaves until their Freedom Dues were earned. The indentured servants became free members of society. The Pennsylvania colony offered freedom to Europeans which contributed to the downfall of freedom for others. The treatment of indentured servant in Pennsylvania caused a great decline in the number of indentured servants migrating to Maryland and Virginia.Colonies began to rely greatly on slave labor. The English rule and indentured servants illustrates how freedom and lack of freedom existed side by side in English colonies. The English rule in New York took away freedom for women and blacks. In Pennsylvania there was religious freedom but the lack of indentured servants migrating to the other colonies caused the colonies to rely greatly on slavery. Pennsylvania and New York demonstrated how freedom and lack of freedom co-existed side by side.